On the third day of the Duke of Edinburgh’s expedition when
it was my turn to lead, we were being accompanied by our Mountain Leader for
the first and only time, owing to the area normally being marsh and it was
written in the risk assessment.
I was asked to lead only a short leg, however, as the most
experienced of the group, it was a harder leg, and I was put on the spot by the
mountain leader for several reasons, one of which was to test my skills, as
Simon didn’t know at what level I was personally at, another was to demonstrate
to the others some different techniques that it was unlikely that they had come
across before, owing to them being less experienced in the field.
After assessing our position, coming up with a plan for the
route; I then began, using differently styles of leadership. It became clear
that although the rest of the group although they had experience in the hills,
they were not know aware of certain techniques that would assist them should
the situation arise that they need to extricate themselves from the area. The skill
that was taught was pacing. The guided discovery style, Mosston and Ashworth
1990, was used when teaching about pacing, as it was something that has a
definite distance, however it is down to the individual to work out their own
personal step count for 100 metres.
Throughout the section which I was leading, guided discovery
was mainly used, owing to the fact that there was not actually much teaching
done aside from the pacing section. In accordance to Lewin, Lippitt and White (1939)
cited in Woods 1998, study on leadership styles, the style that I found was
mainly used on my part was Laissez-faire; when the rest of the group were
allowed to get on with the hike in their own way and style. This suited the
group very well as every member was very laid back, and happy going at their
own pace.
With the gift of hindsight, if I could re-do that particular
leg, I would probably use the same style of leadership, with some subtle
changes to the presentation. Instead of keeping the “story” of the route in my
head, I would tell it to the group, therefore I had not only my mind on the
different areas and sections that needed to be checked, there were 5 more people
looking out for the markers too. This approach would allow me the chance to “look
after” the group more, using more senses than mainly my hearing; as if I had, there
would have been more of a chance to actually speak to the group to establish
how they were doing and whether there was anything that they wanted to change
or learn.
Applying Psychology to
Sport, B. Woods. 1998
Acquiring Skill in
Sport, B. Sharp. 1992
Effective Leadership
in Adventure Programming, S. Priest and M. Gass. 1997
No comments:
Post a Comment